MUKONO — Counsel Medard Lubega Sseggona, the lawyer representing Mukono North Member of Parliament Abdallah Kiwanuka, has expressed confidence in defending his client’s victory following Monday’s court session at the High Court in Mukono.
The Mukono North election petition was heard in court on Monday, September 14, 2026, with the substantive hearing of the case scheduled to continue on September 21, 2026.
Kiwanuka, who was elected on the National Unity Platform (NUP) ticket, has maintained that he has each and every piece of evidence necessary to demonstrate that his victory was genuine and reflected the will of the people of Mukono North.
He insists that the electorate made its choice with the right intentions and that the mandate given to him through the ballot should be respected.
The petition was filed by former State Minister for Water and former Mukono North MP Ronald Kibuule, who is challenging Kiwanuka’s election and seeking a recount of the votes.
Speaking to the press after Monday’s court session, Counsel Sseggona struck a confident tone, maintaining that Kiwanuka’s legal team is prepared to defend the victory before court. He indicated that the defence is ready to rely on the evidence available to demonstrate why Kiwanuka’s election should stand.
Kiwanuka has also raised concerns over what he describes as attempts to interfere with Electoral Commission offices and election materials. He has argued that those allegedly involved in such activities are “fighting for nothing”, insisting that the people of Mukono North already made their choice through the ballot.
The allegations concerning possible interference with Electoral Commission materials remain subject to investigation and should not be treated as established facts unless confirmed by the relevant authorities or determined by court.
The September 21 proceedings are expected to provide both sides with an opportunity to present their evidence and arguments as the court examines the issues raised in the petition.
For Kiwanuka and his legal team, the position remains one of confidence. They maintain that the evidence will demonstrate that the election reflected the will of the people of Mukono North and that Kiwanuka legitimately secured the parliamentary seat.
The court will ultimately determine the petition based on the evidence and legal arguments presented by the parties.
